Classifying and Managing Public Goods

29 novembre 2025

Crée tes propres fiches en 30 secondes

Colle ton cours, Revizly le transforme en résumé, fiches, flashcards et QCM.

Commencer gratuitement

Quick Summary

  • Goods are classified based on excludability and rivalry.
  • Public goods are non-excludable and non-rival, leading to free-rider problems.
  • Common resources are rival but non-excludable, prone to overuse ("Tragedy of the Commons").
  • Merit goods may be under-consumed due to information asymmetry, often requiring government intervention.
  • Market failures justify government provision and regulation of goods.
  • Cost-benefit analysis guides optimal public good provision.
  • Strategies include regulation, taxation, and community-based management.

Concepts and definitions

  • Excludability: ability to prevent access to a good.
  • Rivalry: consumption by one individual diminishes availability to others.
  • Public goods: neither excludable nor rival.
  • Private goods: excludable and rival.
  • Common resources: rival but not excludable.
  • Club goods: excludable but not rival.
  • Free rider: individual who benefits without paying.
  • Merit goods: goods under-consumed without intervention.
  • De-merit goods: goods over-consumed, causing social harm.
  • Tragedy of the Commons: overuse of common resources without regulation.

Formulas, laws, principles

  • Optimal provision: where Marginal Social Benefit (MSB) equals Marginal Cost (MC).
  • Demand curve for public goods: the sum of individual demand curves, forming the MSB curve.
  • Cost-benefit analysis: compare total benefits and total costs to determine if provision is justified.

Methods and procedures

  1. Identify the type of good based on excludability and rivalry.
  2. Apply cost-benefit analysis to assess societal gains versus costs.
  3. Determine the optimal quantity where MSB = MC.
  4. Implement regulation, taxation, or community management to address market failure.
  5. Monitor resource use to prevent depletion, especially for common resources.

Illustrative examples

  • Public goods: street lighting, national defense, public fireworks displays.
  • Common resources: fish stocks, air and water quality, congested roads.
  • Merit goods: education, healthcare, vaccinations.
  • De-merit goods: alcohol, tobacco, gambling.

Pitfalls and points of attention

  • Confusing excludability with rivalry can lead to misclassification.
  • Assuming private markets always provide goods efficiently—failures occur with public or common goods.
  • Overlooking free rider problems in public goods provision.
  • Ignoring behavioral factors and imperfect information that affect consumption of merit and de-merit goods.
  • Under- or overestimating social benefits in cost-benefit analysis due to valuation difficulties.

Glossary

  • Excludability
  • Rivalry
  • Public goods
  • Private goods
  • Common resources
  • Club goods
  • Free rider
  • Merit goods
  • De-merit goods
  • Tragedy of the Commons
  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Marginal Social Benefit (MSB)
  • Marginal Cost (MC)