Adjudication Strategies in International Law

Extrait de la fiche de révision

📋 Course Outline

  1. Deep versus shallow integration and adjudication
  2. Inquisitorial versus adversarial evidence production
  3. Choice of law and judicial interpretation limits
  4. International judges and conservative interpretation
  5. Principal agent view of judges and incentives
  6. Incomplete contracts and judicial role
  7. Precedent, consistency, and de facto follow
  8. DSU structure: panels, appellate review, adoption
  9. WTO dispute settlement: compulsory adjudication and no self-help
  10. DSU objectives: withdrawal, compensation, suspension
  11. Property versus liability remedies in WTO
  12. EU judicial procedure: chambers, grand chamber, urgency

📖 1. Deep versus shallow integration and adjudication

🔑 Key Concepts & Definitions

  • Deep integration : Deep integration creates shared market rules by harmonizing competition conditions across jurisdictions.
  • Shallow integration : Shallow integration keeps national policy autonomy while requiring non-discrimination across jurisdictions.
  • Inquisitorial system : An inquisitorial system gives the judge authority to steer the case and actively produce or obtain evidence.
  • Adversarial system : An adversarial system relies on parties to present evidence, with the judge mainly evaluating what the parties submit.
  • Choice of law : Choice of law is the mechanism that determines which legal system governs a dispute.

📝 Essential Points

Lire la fiche complète →

Aperçu du QCM

1. In what order do the DSU objectives prioritize remedies when a violation is found?

2. What is the main idea of a property-rule-style remedy in WTO dispute settlement?

3. What is the key institutional feature of WTO dispute settlement regarding enforcement?

Faire le QCM (12 questions) →

Aperçu des flashcards

Deep vs shallow integration — difference?

Deep creates shared rules; shallow maintains national autonomy.

Inquisitorial system — role?

Judge actively steers case and produces evidence.

Adversarial system — role?

Parties produce evidence; judge evaluates submissions.

Choice of law — purpose?

Determines which legal system governs a dispute.

Inquisitorial evidence — fit?

Suitable when judge is trusted and active in fact-finding.

Adversarial evidence — fit?

Suitable when parties control evidence and rebuttal.

Voir toutes les 24 flashcards →

Questions fréquentes

Que contient la fiche de révision sur Adjudication Strategies in International Law ?

La fiche de révision couvre les notions essentielles de Adjudication Strategies in International Law. Elle est structurée par thématiques pour faciliter l'apprentissage et la mémorisation, avec des définitions clés, des explications et des synthèses.

Lire la fiche complète →

Combien de questions contient le QCM sur Adjudication Strategies in International Law ?

Le QCM contient 12 questions à choix multiples avec corrections détaillées et explications pour chaque réponse. Idéal pour tester vos connaissances et identifier vos lacunes.

Faire le QCM (12 questions) →

Comment réviser Adjudication Strategies in International Law avec les flashcards ?

Revizly propose 24 flashcards interactives sur Adjudication Strategies in International Law. Chaque carte présente une question au recto et la réponse au verso, permettant une révision active et efficace basée sur la répétition espacée.

Voir toutes les 24 flashcards →

Cours similaires

Crée tes propres fiches depuis tes cours

Importe ton PDF ou colle ton cours, l'IA génère fiches, QCM et flashcards en 30 secondes.