Dilemma = benefits vs harms; controversy = the fight over which wins.
Survey blocks: rank apps, pick hours, choose advantage, name disadvantage.
Effects judgments repeat a theme: compare vs feel supported vs choose reality.
Instagram = image culture → comparison → self-esteem pressure → mental-health risks.
Nuance = correlation≠cause, and confirmation bias can fuel panic.
Rooftop + insults + Facebook attempts = isolation that escalates beyond words.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2019 | Instagram study cited about one in three adolescents and increased anxiety/depression |
| 2020 | Mentioned as a year when similar studies were conducted by researchers cited in the first text |
| 2021 | Cited for similar studies and referenced as the date source for the Instagram chronicle |
Two stances on media harm
| Text | Main claim | Evidence focus |
|---|---|---|
| Marc Cassivi | Instagram harms adolescents’ mental health | Cited studies and reported percentages, plus described minimization by Facebook |
| Nina Duque and Dave Anctil | Effects narratives are oversimplified | Questioning study validity and distinguishing correlation from causation |
Testez vos connaissances sur Social Media Controversies and Impact avec 12 questions à choix multiples avec corrections détaillées.
1. What is a social media controversy?
2. What does the term moral panic describe in the context of social media debates?
Mémorisez les concepts clés de Social Media Controversies and Impact avec 12 flashcards interactives.
Social media dilemma — definition?
Debate over benefits versus harms.
Social media controversy — role?
Public dispute weighing pros and cons.
Moral panic — effect?
Exaggerated collective fear.
Importe ton cours et l'IA génère fiches, QCM et flashcards en 30 secondes.
Générateur de fiches